Which of the following would not be classified as a tort?

The classification of a tort revolves around a wrongful act or infringement of a right leading to legal liability. In this context, keeping a pet rattlesnake would not inherently qualify as a tort unless its ownership resulted in negligence or an injury to another person.

Negligence qualifies as a tort because it involves a breach of duty that causes harm to another party. Strict liability also represents a category of tort law where a party is held responsible for damages without the need to prove negligence or fault, often arising from inherently dangerous activities or products.

While the phrase "any legal wrong" seems broad, it can encompass a wide range of actions, including torts. Keeping a pet rattlesnake, however, does not automatically create liability or constitute a legal wrong unless specific circumstances arise that link it to injury or harm. Therefore, it stands out as the correct answer in this context, as it may not meet the criteria for being classified as a tort without additional factors.